Calorie burn November 19, 2011

by edward 20. November 2011 01:03

Here are the numbers from my HRM for my morning commute:

Activity end time mm:ss KCal burned KCal/min avg HR
Actual (total) time to work 10:15 AM 43:00
356 –.– 124
Riding home (total time) 5:30 PM 49:38 470 –.– 136

I jammed home - did high gear intervals, but didn't spend much time at maximum (90+ %). Just want to make sure my leg muscles don't lose any more strength than necessary.

Tags:
Categories:

Calorie burn September 30, 2011

by edward 30. September 2011 10:00

Today's numbers:

Activity end time mm:ss KCal burned KCal/min avg HR
Road time to work 9:46 AM 37:42 324 –.– 125
Total time to home 7:45 PM
44:34 371 –.– 123

Tomorrow I'll be back on the bodybugg, and able to compare the HRM calorie burn numbers with those from the 'bugg.

Tags:
Categories:

Calorie Burn September 26, 2011

by edward 26. September 2011 10:00

I've started wearing my Heart Rate Monitor (HRM) for my daily commute to work. I've discarded a few days, so I thought I would record the other numbers on this blog before deleting them from the limited memory in the HRM. Here are the number's from today's commute:

Activity end time mm:ss KCal burned KCal/min avg HR
Road time to work 7:52 AM 37:33 393 –.– 138

Maybe next month I'll sign up for a bodybugg subscription again so I can compare my current calorie burn from the HRM with the numbers from the 'bugg.

Tags:
Categories:

Review: Barefoot Running 101 Presentation with Michael Sandler

by edward 16. November 2010 19:54

Last night, I attended the Barefoot Running 101 presentation at the Austin REI. The presentation featured Michael Sandler, author of

Barefoot Running: How to Run Light and Free by Getting in Touch With the Earth, along with his co-author Jessica Lee.

Sandler started by telling a bit of his own story. He was a top-level bicycle racer who went to Europe back in 1990 and stayed until 1993. Since then, he's continued cycling, winning the Colorado state track championship in 2001 and 2002, and placing 7th in the National Master's Cycling Sprints. He competed in the Ironman and other triathlons in 2000-2001. He also took up speed skating, and was sponsored by Rollerblade in 2003-2004. His life took a dramatic turn in 2006 when he crashed while skating, fracturing his left leg and pelvis. After multiple operations, he was left with a titanium femur and hip, a 10 mm leg length difference, and a prognosis that he would never run again.

He then began to talk about the benefits of barefoot running. According to Sandler, because running in standard running shoes requires less blood flow (since the muscles of the feet have to do less work), the body responds by diverting blood flow to other organs. On the other hand foot, running without shoes (or in minimal footgear like Vibram Five Fingers) promotes blood flow, healing and long-term foot health. Sandler claimed that the improvement in blood flow is large enough that feet will stay warmer in cold weather running barefoot or in minimal footgear than in traditional running shoes.

After his enthusiastic exposition of the benefits of barefoot running, he began to talk about the how-tos. He advised running only 200 yards per day, and only every other day, at the start. On the alternate days, he recommends experienced runners go back to their modern running shoes. Of course, this is all detailed in his book, which includes a defined 10- or 12-week program to get into barefoot running. Or so he said - unfortunately, REI didn't have copies of his book for sale at the talk.

In addition to "just running," Sandler's program includes other exercises and stretches. For example, he advocates using the foot and toes to practice picking up a golf ball, and showed how to use a foam roller to "roll out" tight calf and thigh muscles after runs (instead of trying to stretch them out).

He wrapped up his talk by taking questions from the audience. I wondered if the book includes advice for those who haven't been running in modern shoes - it does (the short version: start with barefoot walking, preferably on round, smooth rocks). Another questioner asked how Sandler's barefoot running compared to other minimalist running styles. Sandler replied that his style, with a forefoot strike, was more similar to the POSE method than the midfoot strike of ChiRunning. However, since ChiRunning author Danny Dreyer has written a foreword to Sandler's book, it seems that ChiRunning and Sandler's method are two paths to the same destination.

Categories:

Bodybugg numbers

by edward 12. November 2010 06:56

I've been back on the Bodybugg calorie monitoring armband since November 1st, and I thought I would record the daily numbers I'm seeing, related to the activity for that day.

DateCaloriesActivity
Tu 11/21919Drove to work and back (no exercise)
We 11/32437Bicycled to work and back
Th 11/42264Day off from work (no exercise)
Fr 11/53135Bicycled to work and back, weight training 1.75 hours
Sa 11/62942Bicycled to work and back, weight training 1.5 hours
Su 11/72531Worked from home, weight training 1 1/2 hours
Mo 11/82927Bicycled to work and back, to Office Depot and back, plus Toastmasters
Tu 11/93074Bicycled to work and back, weight training 1.5 hours
We 11/102259Day off from work (no exercise)
Th 11/112419Day off from work, weight training 1.5 hours (calorie total not final)

With these correspondences, I can estimate my calorie burn and let the Bodybugg subscription lapse, or loan the Bodybugg to a friend so they can figure out what they do and how much they burn per day.

Tags:
Categories:

Back on the 'bugg

by edward 1. November 2010 18:08

ACK! I checked my weight this morning and I'm up five pounds in two days, dang it. That wouldn't be too bad if I had been doing a weight workout every day for the past couple of weeks ("We're gonna PUMP...you UP!"), but I haven't done anything more strenuous than bicycling to work on Saturday - and that was the first bike ride in almost a week.

So it's back to the Bodybugg for me - providing the battery will still take a charge. I'll sign up for a month or two of the service later tonight, after I'm sure the arm unit still works.

Weight this morning: 169 pounds (wah-Wah-WAHHHHH...).

Categories:

Comment policy

by edward 10. October 2010 10:10

All comments on this blog are moderated.

Categories: BlogEngine.NET

Review: The End of Overeating, Chapter 5

by edward 12. September 2009 07:31

(originally published September 12, 2009)

Note: in 2009, I and another diarist at DailyKos.com took turns writing reviews of and commentary on chapters of David Kessler's The End of Overeating. I'm archiving my contributions here on GeekMyFitness.com.

Here are links to the previous episodes on DailyKos.com:

Introduction: You Are The Target
(summarized by Edward Spurlock)
Chapter 1: Something Changed . . . America Gained Weight
(summarized by Edward Spurlock)
Chapter 2: Overriding the Wisdom of the Body
(summarized by Clio2)
Chapter 3: Sugar, Fat, and Salt Make Us Eat More Sugar, Fat, and Salt
(summarized by Edward Spurlock)
Chapter 4: The Business of Food: Creating Highly Rewarding Stimuli
(summarized by Clio2)

 

If you want to follow along with this series but you can't get your hands on a copy of Kessler's book just yet, you can read the first six chapters on Google Books.

Chapter 5: Pushing Up Our Settling Points

Kessler begins chapter 5 by talking about "set point theory" - the theory that adult weight is predetermined. According to set point theory, diets fail because if one loses weight, the body will respond by lowering metabolism or increasing appetite until one gains weight back to the set point weight. This is an example of homeostasis.

The problem with applying the homeostatic model of set points to weight control is that according to the theory, overeating should not cause permanent weight gain, any more than "undereating" (i.e., dieting) should cause permanent weight loss. If set point theory is true, the body should respond to overconsumption of food by increasing metabolism, decreasing appetite, or excreting excess calories. Yet people continue to gain weight - how do we explain this?

To explain the recent epidemic of obesity and overweight, set point theory has given way to "settling point theory." According to Kessler,

The settling point theory goes beyond homeostatic mechanisms to make room for a number of independent influences on weight. A somewhat more nuanced model, it is built on the idea that weight is not set at a predetermined level, but is determined by a balance of many factors. On the appetite side, the drive to eat and the capacity to be satisfied are primary. On the expenditure side, the major factors are the ability to oxidize fat and burn calories, along with the level of physical activity. The settling point is the place where all of this comes to equilibrium.

Kessler believes that the settling point is determined by motivation and availability - that is, how motivated we are to seek and how easy it is to obtain foods loaded with sugar, fat, and salt. A short-term diet and/or exercise program can enable us to reach a new desired weight - but returning to our previous levels of consumption and activity will return us to the previous settling point. According to Kessler, the modern increase in foods rich in sugar, fat, and salt have pushed up our settling points and is thus to blame for the obesity epidemic. But not everyone responds to hyperpalatable foods in the same way - some people are simply indifferent to the appeals of sugar, fat, and salt, while others can stop eating after a small quantity. However, for millions of people, the attractions of these foods can activate the reward system, overruling the homeostasis and causing overeating. Says Kessler,

That reward drive can become an obsession, although it's one that many people keep private.

[side note:  I was reminded of the desire to keep one's reward drive private when reading Circle's WHEE diary discussion of the film Eating:

a French journalist...travels to Los Angeles to interview American women. She attends a birthday party with women of all ages in attendance, everything from grandmothers to would-be movie starlets. When the cake is cut and pieces start being sent around the circle, no one will eat the cake.

end of side note - Ed.]

In the latter part of chapter 5, Kessler returns to two of his favorite amusements from earlier in the book - food porn, and tormenting his friends and associates. The star of the food porn is Claudia, a woman he described in the book's Introduction. Claudia returns in Chapter 5 bearing a plate of what she calls "Charlie cookies," a concoction of rolled oats, corn syrup, brown sugar, butter, vanilla, and salt, which is then topped with peanut butter and chocolate chips - in other words, sugar, fat, fat, and salt layered on top of sugar, sugar, fat, and salt. Claudia's description of the appeal of Charlie cookies is highly sensual. I won't repeat it here - you can read it on page 24 of the book, if you dare. (Incidentally, I Googled "charlie cookies," but I could not find a recipe. Of course, I was not planning to actually make Charlie cookies - my interest was purely scientific).

Claudia reappears in the next "scene," along with Maria, Rosalita, and Jacob. Like Claudia, Maria is overweight, and her description of the appeal of Little Debbie Swiss Rolls is almost as sensual as Claudia's description of the Charlie cookies. Neither Rosalita nor Jacob are overweight, but Rosalita obsesses over food much as Claudia and Maria do. She maintains her weight by conscious effort and strategies such as making sure to drink plenty of water and eat vegetables with her meals. Jacob is different from the three women (and from Dr. Kessler) - he is plainly not drawn to food in the way the others are.

Kessler notes that the three women do not fit the clinical definition for having eating disorders, but:

...they feel powerless in the face of certain foods. This may be the primary characteristic of what is sometimes referred to as emotional or compulsive eating...Their behavior is best understood as a reward-driven response to the sensory stimuli associated with food.

At the end of the chapter, Kessler introduces the notion of "salience" as applied to food - that is, the way certain foods can stand out in the mind, causing some people to obsess over those foods in ways unlike the other things they eat. He wraps up the chapter by asking:

How do inanimate objects--M&Ms, Charlie cookies, cake rolls--acquire such power over us? What allows them to so thoroughly dominate our attention?

How do these foods spin so many of us out of control?

Categories:

It's Time For Back-To-School!

by edward 9. September 2009 09:10

(originally published September 9, 2009)

My bike commute runs along the west side of the main University of Texas campus here in Austin. It was a very quiet ride during the summer semester, but now all the students are back, I'm dodging a lot more pedestrians on the way to work. There are compensations, however:


This is actually a picture that was posted to http://pwnedoncamera.com back in July, after the Tour de France -- but that's pretty much how I roll. Or how I would roll, if I didn't have to worry about potholes and dodging other pedestrians. Ah, youth is wasted on the young...

Categories: archive

NEAT, but not gaudy

by edward 9. September 2009 09:09

(originally published September 9, 2009)

When I reviewed the (in)famous TIME Magazine article about exercise not necessarily leading to weightloss, I noted that the most interesting part of the article was this idea:

...whether it is exercise — sweaty, exhausting, hunger-producing bursts of activity done exclusively to benefit our health — that leads to all these benefits or something far simpler: regularly moving during our waking hours...do we need to stress our bodies at the gym?
...
...very frequent, low-level physical activity — the kind humans did for tens of thousands of years before the leaf blower was invented — may actually work better for us than the occasional bouts of exercise you get as a gym rat.

The idea that low-level activity can be "just as good" as sweaty exercise is not a new idea. This is the heart of the "10,000 Steps" exercise programs that have become popular in the last few years.

Last year, the company I work for sponsored a corporate-wide exercise competition based on the "10,000 Steps" concept. Several of my co-workers formed a walking team to go for the site championship. The star of the team was one guy who wore his pedometer and kept moving EVERYWHERE. He even marched in place while watching TV after work. His six-year-old daughter started marching with him in his living room, although she wasn't even on the team! With Jason at the helm (no, the team's name was not the "The Argonauts"), the team won the site victory - and Jason kept up his steps for a few weeks after the challenge and dropped 15 pounds.

Dr. James Levine, of the Mayo Clinic, has coined the acronym NEAT, for Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis. Levine's site notes:

Activity Thermogenesis has two constituents, exercise-related activity thermogenesis and Non-exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT). For the vast majority of dwellers in the U.S., exercise activity thermogenesis is negligible.

Dr. Levine's research has inspired the treadmill desk - a platform that fits above the control head of a treadmill to hold a laptop, phone, books, and other needed office equipment. Dr. Levine has appeared on Good Morning America to talk about the treadmill desk:

What kind of difference can NEAT make? Here are a couple of screenshots showing my calorie expenditure yesterday:

In this first picture, I've used the bodybugg highlight slider to show my energy expenditure from 3:48 to 4:48, when I was sitting at my desk for the whole period. As you can see, the calorie burn per minute was around 1.2 calories per minute - barely more than the bodybugg program assumes one burns while asleep.


Here, I've focused on the period from 2:30 to 3:30 PM. Instead of working at my desk, I was standing in our shipping room, doing nothing more strenuous than putting archive CDs into shipping envelopes. Yet, that low-level activity more than doubled my calorie burn - and I wasn't even marching in place!

Do I think Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis is "just as good" as exercise? Well, looking at the start and end of my work day, you can see the calorie burn from my eight-mile commute to and from work, respectively. This kind of daily exercise (combined with attention to what I eat) has enabled me to lose 30 pounds since I started riding to work back in April. Exercise is GREAT - provided you're ready for it. But I've been riding my bike to work off and on for the past 30 years. I'm experienced and my body responds well to that exercise. If I tried to jog or swim for 90 minutes a day, however, I'd quit after the first week -- if I even lasted that long!

Despite what Gary Taubes or John Cloud might think, exercise CAN work for you - if you can work at the exercise, that is. But if you're not up for that kind of exertion, just "Stepping up" your daily activity can make a huge difference. Isn't that NEAT to know?

Categories: archive